[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yo4Wn7IBdNBR8dWx@FVFYT0MHHV2J.usts.net>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 19:44:31 +0800
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, shakeelb@...gle.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
longman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] mm: thp: make split queue lock safe when LRU
pages are reparented
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 07:54:35PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 02:05:46PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > Similar to the lruvec lock, we use the same approach to make the split
> > queue lock safe when LRU pages are reparented.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
>
> Please, merge this into the previous patch (like Johannes asked
> for the lruvec counterpart).
>
Will do in v5.
> And add:
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev> .
>
Thanks Roman.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists