linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler updates for v5.19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yo4XSzZp68hGAZnF@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 13:47:23 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler updates for v5.19


* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:

> > >  23 files changed, 266 insertions(+), 331 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Note that the above is a v5.18 based shortlog and diffstat, but because the 
> > RCU tree deep-merged one of the scheduler commits that introduced better, 
> > Kconfig-invariant preemption model accessors:
> > 
> >    cfe43f478b79 preempt/dynamic: Introduce preemption model accessors
> 
> Ah, this one:
> 
> cfe43f478b79 ("preempt/dynamic: Introduce preemption model accessors")
> 
> Please accept my apologies for the disruption.  This commit was needed
> to be able to properly handle CONFIG_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC=y kernels booting
> with preempt=none or preempt=voluntary.  But I should have called this
> out in my pull request, and failed to do so.  Again, please accept my
> apologies for the disruption.

No problem - Linus pulled the scheduler tree and all is good now I think.

Thanks,

	Ingo