[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gZCMZ3m7gpPNpZf8_9Uob1km01nA9BFOi9BJhb3fDXmA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 14:56:55 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kernel/reboot: Change registration order of legacy
power-off handler
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:23 PM Dmitry Osipenko
<dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> We're unconditionally registering sys-off handler for the legacy
> pm_power_off() callback, this causes problem for platforms that don't
> use power-off handlers at all and should be halted. Now reboot syscall
> assumes that there is a power-off handler installed and tries to power
> off system instead of halting it.
>
> To fix the trouble, move the handler's registration to the reboot syscall
> and check the pm_power_off() presence.
>
> Fixes: 0e2110d2e910 ("kernel/reboot: Add kernel_can_power_off()")
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com>
> ---
> kernel/reboot.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/reboot.c b/kernel/reboot.c
> index 0bdc64ecf4f6..a091145ee710 100644
> --- a/kernel/reboot.c
> +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
> @@ -569,22 +569,6 @@ static int legacy_pm_power_off(struct sys_off_data *data)
> return NOTIFY_DONE;
> }
>
> -/*
> - * Register sys-off handlers for legacy PM callbacks. This allows legacy
> - * PM callbacks co-exist with the new sys-off API.
> - *
> - * TODO: Remove legacy handlers once all legacy PM users will be switched
> - * to the sys-off based APIs.
> - */
> -static int __init legacy_pm_init(void)
> -{
> - register_sys_off_handler(SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF, SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT,
> - legacy_pm_power_off, NULL);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -core_initcall(legacy_pm_init);
> -
> static void do_kernel_power_off_prepare(void)
> {
> blocking_notifier_call_chain(&power_off_prep_handler_list, 0, NULL);
> @@ -646,6 +630,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(reboot, int, magic1, int, magic2, unsigned int, cmd,
> void __user *, arg)
> {
> struct pid_namespace *pid_ns = task_active_pid_ns(current);
> + struct sys_off_handler *sys_off = NULL;
> char buffer[256];
> int ret = 0;
>
> @@ -670,6 +655,21 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(reboot, int, magic1, int, magic2, unsigned int, cmd,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + /*
> + * Register sys-off handlers for legacy PM callback. This allows
> + * legacy PM callbacks temporary co-exist with the new sys-off API.
> + *
> + * TODO: Remove legacy handlers once all legacy PM users will be
> + * switched to the sys-off based APIs.
> + */
> + if (pm_power_off) {
> + sys_off = register_sys_off_handler(SYS_OFF_MODE_POWER_OFF,
> + SYS_OFF_PRIO_DEFAULT,
> + legacy_pm_power_off, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(sys_off))
> + return PTR_ERR(sys_off);
> + }
> +
> /* Instead of trying to make the power_off code look like
> * halt when pm_power_off is not set do it the easy way.
> */
> @@ -727,6 +727,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(reboot, int, magic1, int, magic2, unsigned int, cmd,
> break;
> }
> mutex_unlock(&system_transition_mutex);
> + unregister_sys_off_handler(sys_off);
> return ret;
> }
>
> --
Applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists