linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 21:08:51 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:     Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, mhocko@...nel.org,
        shakeelb@...gle.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
        longman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/11] mm: memcontrol: prepare objcg API for non-kmem
 usage

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 08:37:58AM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 03:57:17PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 07:36:24PM -0700, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 02:05:41PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > > -	memcg_reparent_list_lrus(memcg, parent);
> > > > +	memcg_reparent_list_lrus(memcg, parent_mem_cgroup(memcg));
> > > We effectively dropped this:
> > > 	if (!parent)
> > > 		parent = root_mem_cgroup;
> > > Is it safe? (assuming v1 non-hierarchical mode, it's usually when all
> > > is getting complicated)
> 
> Yes, it's correct. But it's a quiet, incidental cleanup, so I can see
> why it's confusing. It might be better to split the dead code removal
> into a separate patch - with the following in the changelog ;):
>

Well, I can split the dead code removal into a separate patch. :-)

Thanks.
 
> > Since no-hierarchy mode is deprecated after commit bef8620cd8e0
> > ("mm: memcg: deprecate the non-hierarchical mode"), so
> > parent_mem_cgroup() cannot return a NULL except root memcg,
> > however, root memcg will not be offline, so it is safe. Right?
>