[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220525014424.20717-1-liaochang1@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 09:44:24 +0800
From: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
To: <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, <palmer@...belt.com>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <jszhang@...nel.org>,
<guoren@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] riscv/kprobe: reclaim insn_slot on kprobe unregistration
On kprobe registration kernel allocate one insn_slot for new kprobe,
but it forget to reclaim the insn_slot on unregistration, leading to a
potential leakage.
Reported-by: Chen Guokai <chenguokai17@...ls.ucas.ac.cn>
Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
---
v2:
Add Reported-by tag
arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
index e6e950b7cf32..f12eb1fbb52c 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/probes/kprobes.c
@@ -110,6 +110,10 @@ void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
+ if (p->ainsn.api.insn) {
+ free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.api.insn, 0);
+ p->ainsn.api.insn = NULL;
+ }
}
static void __kprobes save_previous_kprobe(struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists