[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220525150233.GX1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 08:02:33 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Phil Elwell <phil@...pberrypi.com>, regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: vchiq: Performance regression since 5.18-rc1
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-05-25 16:07:47 [+0200], Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > this was the same as Paul send. I think i need more time for investigation,
> > maybe there is an issue with the application.
>
> I haven't seen Paul referring to *that* patch. He pointed to some fs/
> related changes.
True! Both patches changed from a synchronize_rcu() to a
synchronize_rcu_expedited(), but different instances of synchronize_rcu().
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists