[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220525154442.1438081-1-dlatypov@google.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 08:44:38 -0700
From: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
To: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com
Cc: ojeda@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] kunit: more assertion reworking
This is a follow up to these three series:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220113165931.451305-1-dlatypov@google.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220118223506.1701553-1-dlatypov@google.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220125210011.3817742-1-dlatypov@google.com/
The two goals of those series were
a) reduce the size of struct kunit_assert and friends.
(struct kunit_assert went from 48 => 8 bytes on UML.)
b) simplify the internal code, mostly by deleting macros
This series goes further
a) sizeof(struct kunit_assert) = 0 now
b) e.g. we delete another class of macros (KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT)
Note: this does change the function signature of
kunit_do_failed_assertion, so we'd need to update the rust wrapper in https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/linux/blob/rust/rust/kernel/kunit.rs
But otherwise, I don't think this series changes anything on the
rust-side.
Daniel Latypov (4):
rfc: kunit: remove format func from struct kunit_assert, get it to 0
bytes
rfc: kunit: rename base KUNIT_ASSERTION macro to _KUNIT_FAILED
rfc: kunit: eliminate KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT macros
kunit: delcare kunit_assert structs as const
include/kunit/assert.h | 74 ++-----------------------
include/kunit/test.h | 123 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
lib/kunit/test.c | 7 ++-
3 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 128 deletions(-)
base-commit: e7eaffce47b7db72b077630dbe836f0c4132496d
--
2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists