[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTTkpHLZf-+VXZE_gCn=5ZJ5FS3jOxKLVoMyL4i=baPd7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 00:08:22 +0800
From: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 20/20] riscv: compat: Add COMPAT Kbuild skeletal support
Thx Heiko & Guenter,
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 7:10 PM Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
>
> Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2022, 12:57:30 CEST schrieb Heiko Stübner:
> > Am Mittwoch, 25. Mai 2022, 00:06:46 CEST schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 01:46:38AM +0800, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > [ ... ]
> > >
> > > > > The problem is come from "__dls3's vdso decode part in musl's
> > > > > ldso/dynlink.c". The ehdr->e_phnum & ehdr->e_phentsize are wrong.
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the root cause is from musl's implementation with the wrong
> > > > > elf parser. I would fix that soon.
> > > > Not elf parser, it's "aux vector just past environ[]". I think I could
> > > > solve this, but anyone who could help dig in is welcome.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I am not sure I understand what you are saying here. Point is that my
> > > root file system, generated with musl a year or so ago, crashes with
> > > your patch set applied. That is a regression, even if there is a bug
> > > in musl.
Thx for the report, it's a valuable regression for riscv-compat.
> >
> > Also as I said in the other part of the thread, the rootfs seems innocent,
> > as my completely-standard Debian riscv64 rootfs is also affected.
> >
> > The merged version seems to be v12 [0] - not sure how we this discussion
> > ended up in v9, but I just tested this revision in two variants:
> >
> > - v5.17 + this v9 -> works nicely
>
> I take that back ... now going back to that build I somehow also run into
> that issue here ... will investigate more.
Yeah, it's my fault. I've fixed up it, please have a try:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220525160404.2930984-1-guoren@kernel.org/T/#u
>
>
> > - v5.18-rc6 + this v9 (rebased onto it) -> breaks the boot
> > The only rebase-conflict was with the introduction of restartable
> > sequences and removal of the tracehook include, but turning CONFIG_RSEQ
> > off doesn't seem to affect the breakage.
> >
> > So it looks like something changed between 5.17 and 5.18 that causes the issue.
> >
> >
> > Heiko
> >
> >
> > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220405071314.3225832-1-guoren@kernel.org/
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists