[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEuxdoXoasdAPzAik2Xge7vU5Fp4SMxiqk3eGZCwC8s9eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 10:33:11 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: mst <mst@...hat.com>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
eperezma <eperezma@...hat.com>, Cindy Lu <lulu@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/9] rework on the IRQ hardening of virtio
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 12:28 AM Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 May 2022 10:53:23 +0200
> Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 May 2022 11:59:42 +0800
> > Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All:
> >
> > Sorry for being slow on this one. I'm pretty much under water. Will try
> > to get some regression-testing done till tomorrow end of day.
> >
>
> Did some testing with the two stage indicators disabled. Didn't see any
> significant difference in performance, and with that also no performance
> regression. IMHO we are good to go ahead!
Great!
>
> Sorry it took so long.
No worries and thanks a lot for the help.
I will repost a version with some comments tweaked that is suggested
by Cornelia Huck.
Thanks
>
> Regards,
> Halil
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists