linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <mhng-54a3577b-2ae9-4ca0-a27d-f75f13807a29@palmer-ri-x1c9>
Date:   Wed, 25 May 2022 17:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     guoren@...nel.org
CC:     linux@...ck-us.net, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, heiko@...ech.de,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, guoren@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject:     Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

On Wed, 25 May 2022 17:39:39 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 15:56:07 PDT (-0700), linux@...ck-us.net wrote:
>> On 5/25/22 14:34, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@...ck-us.net wrote:
>>>> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
>>>>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
>>>>> fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
>>>>> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
>>>>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
>>>>> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
>>>>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
>>>>> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
>>>>> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
>>>>> 00ffffffc58199f0
>>>>> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
>>>>> ffffffffffffffff
>>>>> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
>>>>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
>>>>> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
>>>>> 00ffffffc5819a00
>>>>> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
>>>>> 00ffffffc5819b00
>>>>> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
>>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>>> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
>>>>> 00ffffff8ade0728
>>>>> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
>>>>> 00ffffffc5819e40
>>>>> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
>>>>> 0000000000000000
>>>>> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
>>>>> 0000000000000001
>>>>> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
>>>>> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
>>>>> cause: 000000000000000d
>>>>>
>>>>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
>>>>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
>>>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
>>>>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
>>>>
>>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
>>>
>>> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed out earlier?
>>>
>> Yes.
>
> Awosome, I think that was the only big blocker so far.
>
> I added a musl-based userspace to my test setup, which is rv64-only
> (buildroot doesn't have rv32 musl, I thought upstream had it but maybe
> i'm misremembering).  This patch fixes the bug, so I've added it to
> for-next with

Just saw the v2, so I'm using that instead.

>
> Fixes: 3092eb456375 ("riscv: compat: vdso: Add setup additional pages implementation")
>
> which I think is correct, but LMK if there's an issue.
>
> Thanks!
>
> (and also sorry I poked Geert instead of you about this one, oops ;))
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guenter
>>
>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
>>>>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>>>   };
>>>>>
>>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>>>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
>>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
>>>>> +        .name   = "[vvar]",
>>>>> +        .fault = vvar_fault,
>>>>> +    },
>>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
>>>>> +        .name   = "[vdso]",
>>>>> +        .mremap = vdso_mremap,
>>>>> +    },
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
>>>>>       .name = "compat_vdso",
>>>>>       .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
>>>>>       .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
>>>>> -    .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>>>> -    .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>>> +    .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
>>>>> +    .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
>>>>>   };
>>>>>   #endif
>>>>>