linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJF2gTQQEYKz7EG9=bdSC6E4_ds5D9FmAK1TBZgmsB3T-nrGiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 May 2022 09:25:51 +0800
From:   Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: compat: Using seperated vdso_maps for compat_vdso_info

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 8:43 AM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 May 2022 17:39:39 PDT (-0700), Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2022 15:56:07 PDT (-0700), linux@...ck-us.net wrote:
> >> On 5/25/22 14:34, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 25 May 2022 14:15:03 PDT (-0700), linux@...ck-us.net wrote:
> >>>> On 5/25/22 09:04, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> >>>>> From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is a fixup for vdso implementation which caused musl to
> >>>>> fail.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [   11.600082] Run /sbin/init as init process
> >>>>> [   11.628561] init[1]: unhandled signal 11 code 0x1 at
> >>>>> 0x0000000000000000 in libc.so[ffffff8ad39000+a4000]
> >>>>> [   11.629398] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted
> >>>>> 5.18.0-rc7-next-20220520 #1
> >>>>> [   11.629462] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
> >>>>> [   11.629546] epc : 00ffffff8ada1100 ra : 00ffffff8ada13c8 sp :
> >>>>> 00ffffffc58199f0
> >>>>> [   11.629586]  gp : 00ffffff8ad39000 tp : 00ffffff8ade0998 t0 :
> >>>>> ffffffffffffffff
> >>>>> [   11.629598]  t1 : 00ffffffc5819fd0 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 :
> >>>>> 00ffffff8ade0cc0
> >>>>> [   11.629610]  s1 : 00ffffff8ade0cc0 a0 : 0000000000000000 a1 :
> >>>>> 00ffffffc5819a00
> >>>>> [   11.629622]  a2 : 0000000000000001 a3 : 000000000000001e a4 :
> >>>>> 00ffffffc5819b00
> >>>>> [   11.629634]  a5 : 00ffffffc5819b00 a6 : 0000000000000000 a7 :
> >>>>> 0000000000000000
> >>>>> [   11.629645]  s2 : 00ffffff8ade0ac8 s3 : 00ffffff8ade0ec8 s4 :
> >>>>> 00ffffff8ade0728
> >>>>> [   11.629656]  s5 : 00ffffff8ade0a90 s6 : 0000000000000000 s7 :
> >>>>> 00ffffffc5819e40
> >>>>> [   11.629667]  s8 : 00ffffff8ade0ca0 s9 : 00ffffff8addba50 s10:
> >>>>> 0000000000000000
> >>>>> [   11.629678]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : 0000000000000002 t4 :
> >>>>> 0000000000000001
> >>>>> [   11.629688]  t5 : 0000000000020000 t6 : ffffffffffffffff
> >>>>> [   11.629699] status: 0000000000004020 badaddr: 0000000000000000
> >>>>> cause: 000000000000000d
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The last __vdso_init(&compat_vdso_info) replaces the data in normal
> >>>>> vdso_info. This is an obvious bug.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> >>>>> Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
> >>>>> Cc: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
> >>>>
> >>>> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> >>>
> >>> Sorry I'm a bit buried right now, this is fixing the issue you pointed out earlier?
> >>>
> >> Yes.
> >
> > Awosome, I think that was the only big blocker so far.
> >
> > I added a musl-based userspace to my test setup, which is rv64-only
> > (buildroot doesn't have rv32 musl, I thought upstream had it but maybe
> > i'm misremembering).  This patch fixes the bug, so I've added it to
> > for-next with
>
> Just saw the v2, so I'm using that instead.
Sorry, v2 should be abandoned. Just adding Tested-by is enough.

>
> >
> > Fixes: 3092eb456375 ("riscv: compat: vdso: Add setup additional pages implementation")
> >
> > which I think is correct, but LMK if there's an issue.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > (and also sorry I poked Geert instead of you about this one, oops ;))
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Guenter
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>   arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> >>>>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>>> index 50fe4c877603..69b05b6c181b 100644
> >>>>> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>>> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vdso.c
> >>>>> @@ -206,12 +206,23 @@ static struct __vdso_info vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >>>>>   };
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> >>>>> +static struct vm_special_mapping rv_compat_vdso_maps[] __ro_after_init = {
> >>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR] = {
> >>>>> +        .name   = "[vvar]",
> >>>>> +        .fault = vvar_fault,
> >>>>> +    },
> >>>>> +    [RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO] = {
> >>>>> +        .name   = "[vdso]",
> >>>>> +        .mremap = vdso_mremap,
> >>>>> +    },
> >>>>> +};
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>   static struct __vdso_info compat_vdso_info __ro_after_init = {
> >>>>>       .name = "compat_vdso",
> >>>>>       .vdso_code_start = compat_vdso_start,
> >>>>>       .vdso_code_end = compat_vdso_end,
> >>>>> -    .dm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> >>>>> -    .cm = &rv_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >>>>> +    .dm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VVAR],
> >>>>> +    .cm = &rv_compat_vdso_maps[RV_VDSO_MAP_VDSO],
> >>>>>   };
> >>>>>   #endif
> >>>>>



-- 
Best Regards
 Guo Ren

ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/