lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yo+YfEWLiCVekG5l@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 May 2022 16:10:52 +0100
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        jpoimboe@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        elver@...gle.com, jbaron@...mai.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        ardb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] context_tracking: Always inline empty stubs

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 08:02:06AM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:52:59PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Because GCC is seriously challenged..
> 
> Or are these CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH?

Does it matter?

The fact that CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y forces GCC to place these
out-of-line is really a debugging aid, since it shows us what it could
potentially leave out-of-line. It's not the *only* reason GCC might do this
(e.g. I see sanitizers and other debug options often have similar effects on
arm64).

So FWIW, for the patch:

  Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>

... as I'd like this for arm64, even if you don't beleive that's necessary for
x86.

Thanks,
Mark.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ