linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 09/17] md/raid5-cache: Don't pass conf to r5c_calculate_new

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220526163604.32736-10-logang@deltatee.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 May 2022 10:35:56 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Donald Buczek <buczek@...gen.mpg.de>,
        Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
        Xiao Ni <xni@...hat.com>, Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
        David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 09/17] md/raid5-cache: Don't pass conf to r5c_calculate_new_cp()

r5c_calculate_new_cp() only uses conf to dereference the log which
both callers already have a pointer to and no longer need to
obtain a conf through a complicated dereference chain for this use.

No functional changes intended.

Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 drivers/md/raid5-cache.c | 14 +++++---------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
index 8284ce3e5cf6..9a8f2a988b03 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5-cache.c
@@ -1168,10 +1168,9 @@ static void r5l_run_no_space_stripes(struct r5l_log *log)
  * for write through mode, returns log->next_checkpoint
  * for write back, returns log_start of first sh in stripe_in_journal_list
  */
-static sector_t r5c_calculate_new_cp(struct r5conf *conf)
+static sector_t r5c_calculate_new_cp(struct r5l_log *log)
 {
 	struct stripe_head *sh;
-	struct r5l_log *log = conf->log;
 	sector_t new_cp;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -1179,12 +1178,12 @@ static sector_t r5c_calculate_new_cp(struct r5conf *conf)
 		return log->next_checkpoint;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&log->stripe_in_journal_lock, flags);
-	if (list_empty(&conf->log->stripe_in_journal_list)) {
+	if (list_empty(&log->stripe_in_journal_list)) {
 		/* all stripes flushed */
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&log->stripe_in_journal_lock, flags);
 		return log->next_checkpoint;
 	}
-	sh = list_first_entry(&conf->log->stripe_in_journal_list,
+	sh = list_first_entry(&log->stripe_in_journal_list,
 			      struct stripe_head, r5c);
 	new_cp = sh->log_start;
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&log->stripe_in_journal_lock, flags);
@@ -1193,10 +1192,8 @@ static sector_t r5c_calculate_new_cp(struct r5conf *conf)
 
 static sector_t r5l_reclaimable_space(struct r5l_log *log)
 {
-	struct r5conf *conf = log->rdev->mddev->private;
-
 	return r5l_ring_distance(log, log->last_checkpoint,
-				 r5c_calculate_new_cp(conf));
+				 r5c_calculate_new_cp(log));
 }
 
 static void r5l_run_no_mem_stripe(struct r5l_log *log)
@@ -1517,7 +1514,6 @@ static void r5c_do_reclaim(struct r5conf *conf)
 
 static void r5l_do_reclaim(struct r5l_log *log)
 {
-	struct r5conf *conf = log->rdev->mddev->private;
 	sector_t reclaim_target = xchg(&log->reclaim_target, 0);
 	sector_t reclaimable;
 	sector_t next_checkpoint;
@@ -1546,7 +1542,7 @@ static void r5l_do_reclaim(struct r5l_log *log)
 				    log->io_list_lock);
 	}
 
-	next_checkpoint = r5c_calculate_new_cp(conf);
+	next_checkpoint = r5c_calculate_new_cp(log);
 	spin_unlock_irq(&log->io_list_lock);
 
 	if (reclaimable == 0 || !write_super)
-- 
2.30.2