[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220526203056.81123-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 22:36:56 +0206
From: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "printk: wake up all waiters"
This reverts commit 938ba4084abcf6fdd21d9078513c52f8fb9b00d0.
The wait queue @log_wait never has exclusive waiters, so there
is no need to use wake_up_interruptible_all(). Using
wake_up_interruptible() was the correct function to wake all
waiters.
Since there are no exclusive waiters, erroneously changing
wake_up_interruptible() to wake_up_interruptible_all() did not
result in any behavior change. However, using
wake_up_interruptible_all() on a wait queue without exclusive
waiters is fundamentally wrong.
Go back to using wake_up_interruptible() to wake all waiters.
Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/printk/printk.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index a3e1035929b0..ea3dd55709e7 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -3904,7 +3904,7 @@ static void wake_up_klogd_work_func(struct irq_work *irq_work)
}
if (pending & PRINTK_PENDING_WAKEUP)
- wake_up_interruptible_all(&log_wait);
+ wake_up_interruptible(&log_wait);
}
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct irq_work, wake_up_klogd_work) =
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists