lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 26 May 2022 21:08:11 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Robert Dinse <nanook@...imo.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] KVM: x86: Harden _regs accesses to guard against buggy input

WARN and truncate the incoming GPR number/index when reading/writing GPRs
in the emulator to guard against KVM bugs, e.g. to avoid out-of-bounds
accesses to ctxt->_regs[] if KVM generates a bogus index.  Truncate the
index instead of returning e.g. zero, as reg_write() returns a pointer
to the register, i.e. returning zero would result in a NULL pointer
dereference.  KVM could also force the index to any arbitrary GPR, but
that's no better or worse, just different.

Open code the restriction to 16 registers; RIP is handled via _eip and
should never be accessed through reg_read() or reg_write().  See the
comments above the declarations of reg_read() and reg_write(), and the
behavior of writeback_registers().  The horrific open coded mess will be
cleaned up in a future commit.

There are no such bugs known to exist in the emulator, but determining
that KVM is bug-free is not at all simple and requires a deep dive into
the emulator.  The code is so convoluted that GCC-12 with the recently
enable -Warray-bounds spits out a false-positive due to a GCC bug:

  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:254:27: warning: array subscript 32 is above array
                                 bounds of 'long unsigned int[17]' [-Warray-bounds]
    254 |         return ctxt->_regs[nr];
        |                ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
  In file included from arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c:23:
  arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h: In function 'reg_rmw':
  arch/x86/kvm/kvm_emulate.h:366:23: note: while referencing '_regs'
    366 |         unsigned long _regs[NR_VCPU_REGS];
        |                       ^~~~~

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YofQlBrlx18J7h9Y@google.com
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216026
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105679
Reported-and-tested-by: Robert Dinse <nanook@...imo.com>
Reported-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index 7226a127ccb4..c58366ae4da2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -247,6 +247,9 @@ enum x86_transfer_type {
 
 static ulong reg_read(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
 {
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr >= 16))
+		nr &= 16 - 1;
+
 	if (!(ctxt->regs_valid & (1 << nr))) {
 		ctxt->regs_valid |= 1 << nr;
 		ctxt->_regs[nr] = ctxt->ops->read_gpr(ctxt, nr);
@@ -256,6 +259,9 @@ static ulong reg_read(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
 
 static ulong *reg_write(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, unsigned nr)
 {
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(nr >= 16))
+		nr &= 16 - 1;
+
 	ctxt->regs_valid |= 1 << nr;
 	ctxt->regs_dirty |= 1 << nr;
 	return &ctxt->_regs[nr];
-- 
2.36.1.255.ge46751e96f-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ