linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] platform/x86/intel: Fix pmt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9df6d96f9672b16ca88f5d2c7dd43c87ae938ad3.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 May 2022 15:48:49 -0700
From:   "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To:     David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] platform/x86/intel: Fix pmt_crashlog array
 reference

On Thu, 2022-05-26 at 16:31 -0400, David Arcari wrote:
> The probe function pmt_crashlog_probe() may incorrectly reference
> the 'priv->entry array' as it uses 'i' to reference the array instead
> of 'priv->num_entries' as it should.  This is similar to the problem
> that was addressed in pmt_telemetry_probe via commit 2cdfa0c20d58
> ("platform/x86/intel: Fix 'rmmod pmt_telemetry' panic").
> 
> Cc: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: David Arcari <darcari@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c
> b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c
> index 34daf9df168b..ace1239bc0a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/pmt/crashlog.c
> @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int pmt_crashlog_probe(struct auxiliary_device
> *auxdev,
>  	auxiliary_set_drvdata(auxdev, priv);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < intel_vsec_dev->num_resources; i++) {
> -		struct intel_pmt_entry *entry = &priv->entry[i].entry;
> +		struct intel_pmt_entry *entry = &priv->entry[priv-
> >num_entries].entry;
>  
>  		ret = intel_pmt_dev_create(entry, &pmt_crashlog_ns,
> intel_vsec_dev, i);
>  		if (ret < 0)

Reviewed-by: David E. Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>

Thanks