[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220527084849.070621609@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 10:50:29 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 149/163] random: use proper jiffies comparison macro
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
commit 8a5b8a4a4ceb353b4dd5bafd09e2b15751bcdb51 upstream.
This expands to exactly the same code that it replaces, but makes things
consistent by using the same macro for jiffy comparisons throughout.
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/char/random.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static bool crng_has_old_seed(void)
interval = max_t(unsigned int, CRNG_RESEED_START_INTERVAL,
(unsigned int)uptime / 2 * HZ);
}
- return time_after(jiffies, READ_ONCE(base_crng.birth) + interval);
+ return time_is_before_jiffies(READ_ONCE(base_crng.birth) + interval);
}
/*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists