linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "printk: wake up all waiters"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YpDJduWln8D8Or6y@alley>
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 14:52:06 +0200
From:   Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "printk: wake up all waiters"

On Thu 2022-05-26 22:36:56, John Ogness wrote:
> This reverts commit 938ba4084abcf6fdd21d9078513c52f8fb9b00d0.
> 
> The wait queue @log_wait never has exclusive waiters, so there
> is no need to use wake_up_interruptible_all(). Using
> wake_up_interruptible() was the correct function to wake all
> waiters.
> 
> Since there are no exclusive waiters, erroneously changing
> wake_up_interruptible() to wake_up_interruptible_all() did not
> result in any behavior change. However, using
> wake_up_interruptible_all() on a wait queue without exclusive
> waiters is fundamentally wrong.
> 
> Go back to using wake_up_interruptible() to wake all waiters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>

The patch has been committed into printk/linux.git, branch
rework/printk.

I am going to create the pull request the following week
after it gets at least one spin in linux-next.

It is trivial patch so that it might be sent directly.
But it does not affect the functionality and is is not
urgent either.

Best Regards,
Petr