[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220527155546.1528910-11-vkuznets@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 17:55:19 +0200
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
Siddharth Chandrasekaran <sidcha@...zon.de>,
Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/37] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Don't use sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask() in kvm_hv_send_ipi()
Get rid of on-stack allocation of vcpu_mask and optimize kvm_hv_send_ipi()
for a smaller number of vCPUs in the request. When Hyper-V TLB flush
is in use, HvSendSyntheticClusterIpi{,Ex} calls are not commonly used to
send IPIs to a large number of vCPUs (and are rarely used in general).
Introduce hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set() to directly check if the specified
VP_ID is present in sparse vCPU set.
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
index c43355cb60bc..b347971b3924 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/hyperv.c
@@ -1747,6 +1747,25 @@ static void sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask(struct kvm *kvm, u64 *sparse_banks,
}
}
+static bool hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set(u32 vp_id, u64 valid_bank_mask, u64 sparse_banks[])
+{
+ int bank, sbank = 0;
+
+ if (!test_bit(vp_id / HV_VCPUS_PER_SPARSE_BANK,
+ (unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask))
+ return false;
+
+ for_each_set_bit(bank, (unsigned long *)&valid_bank_mask,
+ KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS) {
+ if (bank == vp_id / HV_VCPUS_PER_SPARSE_BANK)
+ break;
+ sbank++;
+ }
+
+ return test_bit(vp_id % HV_VCPUS_PER_SPARSE_BANK,
+ (unsigned long *)&sparse_banks[sbank]);
+}
+
struct kvm_hv_hcall {
u64 param;
u64 ingpa;
@@ -2029,8 +2048,8 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
((u64)hc->rep_cnt << HV_HYPERCALL_REP_COMP_OFFSET);
}
-static void kvm_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
- unsigned long *vcpu_bitmap)
+static void kvm_hv_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
+ u64 *sparse_banks, u64 valid_bank_mask)
{
struct kvm_lapic_irq irq = {
.delivery_mode = APIC_DM_FIXED,
@@ -2040,7 +2059,10 @@ static void kvm_send_ipi_to_many(struct kvm *kvm, u32 vector,
unsigned long i;
kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
- if (vcpu_bitmap && !test_bit(i, vcpu_bitmap))
+ if (sparse_banks &&
+ !hv_is_vp_in_sparse_set(kvm_hv_get_vpindex(vcpu),
+ valid_bank_mask,
+ sparse_banks))
continue;
/* We fail only when APIC is disabled */
@@ -2053,7 +2075,6 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
struct hv_send_ipi_ex send_ipi_ex;
struct hv_send_ipi send_ipi;
- DECLARE_BITMAP(vcpu_mask, KVM_MAX_VCPUS);
unsigned long valid_bank_mask;
u64 sparse_banks[KVM_HV_MAX_SPARSE_VCPU_SET_BITS];
u32 vector;
@@ -2115,13 +2136,7 @@ static u64 kvm_hv_send_ipi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_hv_hcall *hc)
if ((vector < HV_IPI_LOW_VECTOR) || (vector > HV_IPI_HIGH_VECTOR))
return HV_STATUS_INVALID_HYPERCALL_INPUT;
- if (all_cpus) {
- kvm_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, NULL);
- } else {
- sparse_set_to_vcpu_mask(kvm, sparse_banks, valid_bank_mask, vcpu_mask);
-
- kvm_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, vcpu_mask);
- }
+ kvm_hv_send_ipi_to_many(kvm, vector, all_cpus ? NULL : sparse_banks, valid_bank_mask);
ret_success:
return HV_STATUS_SUCCESS;
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists