[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220527171001.GT1790663@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 10:10:01 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Cc: frederic@...nel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Cleanup RCU urgency state for offline CPU
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 09:55:12AM +0800, Zqiang wrote:
> When an RCU grace period starts and at this time the CPU is in
> the process of going offline, if the RCU gp-fqs occurs during the
> time period when the CPU has passed the stop-machine but has not
> yet entered the idle loop, and this CPU have not report quiescent
> state yet, its urgent flags maybe is set, for example due to cbovld
> is true, but this CPUs rcu urgent flags is not cleanup in rcu_report_dead()
> when report qs. however for CPU that have been report qs, its rcu
> urgent flags should cleanup, so add rcu_disable_urgency_upon_qs()
> in rcu_report_dead() when CPU report qs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang1.zhang@...el.com>
Good catch, thank you!
I have queued this on -rcu, and it will become visible on kernel.org
on my next rebase. Assuming good test results and no objections from
reviews, I will submit this not to the current merge window, but to
the next merge window (v5.20).
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists