| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220527183530.x4rpomvpehxctf3l@google.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 11:35:30 -0700
From: Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev, Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@...lri.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix segbase for ld.lld linked objects
On 2022-05-27, Ian Rogers wrote:
>On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 11:49 PM Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:52 PM Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > segbase is the address of .eh_frame_hdr and table_data is segbase plus
>> > the header size. find_proc_info computes segbase as `map->start +
>> > segbase - map->pgoff` which is wrong when
>> >
>> > * .eh_frame_hdr and .text are in different PT_LOAD program headers
>> > * and their p_vaddr difference does not equal their p_offset difference
>> >
>> > Since 10.0, ld.lld's default --rosegment -z noseparate-code layout has
>> > such R and RX PT_LOAD program headers.
>> >
>> > ld.lld => fail
>> > ld.lld --no-rosegment => ok
>> > ld.lld -z separate-code => ok
>> >
>> > ld.bfd -z separate-code (default for Linux/x86) => ok
>> > ld.bfd -z noseparate-code => ok
>> >
>> > To fix the issue, compute segbase as dso's base address plus
>> > PT_GNU_EH_FRAME's p_vaddr.
>> >
>> > Reported-by: Sebastian Ullrich <sebasti@...lri.ch>
>> > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1646
>> > Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
>> > Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>>
>> Thanks Fangrui! I tested static vs not, bfd and lld, perf test and
>> some hand tests. I couldn't see anything out of order. The code looks
>> good although there could be some ambiguity over the variables ending
>> _addr as these are the ELF given addresses rather than the thread's
>> virtual memory addresses. I'm also trying to get more comments
>> especially on major data structures like dso, but that can be fixed as
>> a follow-on.
>>
>> Tested-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
>>
>> > ---
>> > tools/perf/util/dso.h | 2 +
>> > tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++--------
>> > 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/dso.h b/tools/perf/util/dso.h
>> > index 3a9fd4d389b5..ec4fc1a9454b 100644
>> > --- a/tools/perf/util/dso.h
>> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/dso.h
>> > @@ -179,6 +179,7 @@ struct dso {
>> > bool loaded;
>> > u8 rel;
>> > struct build_id bid;
>> > + u64 base_addr;
>
>This is an address in a thread, as one dso can be shared by multiple
>threads/processes it seems unsafe to hold it as the dso may be loaded
>at a different address in a different thread. For now we can just
>recompute the value rather than store it in the dso.
Ack. Thanks for spotting the issue!
I did not know that dso can be shared (read the code for the first
time), guessing this is why `dso__data_get_fd(dso, ui->machine);` needs
a lock.
>> > u64 text_offset;
>> > const char *short_name;
>> > const char *long_name;
>> > @@ -197,6 +198,7 @@ struct dso {
>> > u64 file_size;
>> > struct list_head open_entry;
>> > u64 debug_frame_offset;
>> > + u64 eh_frame_hdr_addr;
>
>This is the elf section address and safe to hold here.
Ack.
Fixed in PATCH v2
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-perf-users/20220527182039.673248-1-maskray@google.com/T/#u
>Thanks,
>Ian
>
>> > u64 eh_frame_hdr_offset;
>> > } data;
>> > /* bpf prog information */
>> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
>> > index 41e29fc7648a..7a0053954e49 100644
>> > --- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
>> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c
>> > @@ -169,30 +169,55 @@ static int __dw_read_encoded_value(u8 **p, u8 *end, u64 *val,
>> > __v; \
>> > })
>> >
>> > -static u64 elf_section_offset(int fd, const char *name)
>> > +static int elf_section_address_and_offset(int fd, const char *name, u64 *address, u64 *offset)
>> > {
>> > Elf *elf;
>> > GElf_Ehdr ehdr;
>> > GElf_Shdr shdr;
>> > - u64 offset = 0;
>> > + int ret;
>> >
>> > elf = elf_begin(fd, PERF_ELF_C_READ_MMAP, NULL);
>> > if (elf == NULL)
>> > - return 0;
>> > + return -1;
>> >
>> > - do {
>> > - if (gelf_getehdr(elf, &ehdr) == NULL)
>> > - break;
>> > + if (gelf_getehdr(elf, &ehdr) == NULL)
>> > + goto out_err;
>> >
>> > - if (!elf_section_by_name(elf, &ehdr, &shdr, name, NULL))
>> > - break;
>> > -
>> > - offset = shdr.sh_offset;
>> > - } while (0);
>> > + if (!elf_section_by_name(elf, &ehdr, &shdr, name, NULL))
>> > + goto out_err;
>> >
>> > + *address = shdr.sh_addr;
>> > + *offset = shdr.sh_offset;
>> > + ret = 0;
>> > +out_err:
>> > elf_end(elf);
>> > + return ret;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +#ifndef NO_LIBUNWIND_DEBUG_FRAME
>> > +static u64 elf_section_offset(int fd, const char *name)
>> > +{
>> > + u64 address, offset;
>> > +
>> > + if (elf_section_address_and_offset(fd, name, &address, &offset))
>> > + return 0;
>> > +
>> > return offset;
>> > }
>> > +#endif
>> > +
>> > +static int elf_base_address(int fd)
>> > +{
>> > + Elf *elf = elf_begin(fd, PERF_ELF_C_READ_MMAP, NULL);
>> > + GElf_Phdr phdr;
>> > + int retval = 0;
>> > +
>> > + if (gelf_getphdr(elf, 0, &phdr) != NULL)
>> > + retval = phdr.p_vaddr & -getpagesize();
>> > +
>> > + elf_end(elf);
>> > + return retval;
>> > +}
>> >
>> > #ifndef NO_LIBUNWIND_DEBUG_FRAME
>> > static int elf_is_exec(int fd, const char *name)
>> > @@ -248,8 +273,7 @@ struct eh_frame_hdr {
>> > } __packed;
>> >
>> > static int unwind_spec_ehframe(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine,
>> > - u64 offset, u64 *table_data, u64 *segbase,
>> > - u64 *fde_count)
>> > + u64 offset, u64 *table_data_offset, u64 *fde_count)
>> > {
>> > struct eh_frame_hdr hdr;
>> > u8 *enc = (u8 *) &hdr.enc;
>> > @@ -265,35 +289,45 @@ static int unwind_spec_ehframe(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine,
>> > dw_read_encoded_value(enc, end, hdr.eh_frame_ptr_enc);
>> >
>> > *fde_count = dw_read_encoded_value(enc, end, hdr.fde_count_enc);
>> > - *segbase = offset;
>> > - *table_data = (enc - (u8 *) &hdr) + offset;
>> > + *table_data_offset = enc - (u8 *) &hdr;
>> > return 0;
>> > }
>> >
>> > -static int read_unwind_spec_eh_frame(struct dso *dso, struct machine *machine,
>> > +static int read_unwind_spec_eh_frame(struct dso *dso, struct unwind_info *ui,
>> > u64 *table_data, u64 *segbase,
>> > u64 *fde_count)
>> > {
>> > - int ret = -EINVAL, fd;
>> > - u64 offset = dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_offset;
>> > + struct map *map;
>> > + int ret, fd;
>> >
>> > - if (offset == 0) {
>> > - fd = dso__data_get_fd(dso, machine);
>> > + if (dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_offset == 0) {
>> > + u64 addr_min = UINT64_MAX;
>> > +
>> > + fd = dso__data_get_fd(dso, ui->machine);
>> > if (fd < 0)
>> > return -EINVAL;
>> >
>> > /* Check the .eh_frame section for unwinding info */
>> > - offset = elf_section_offset(fd, ".eh_frame_hdr");
>> > - dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_offset = offset;
>> > + ret = elf_section_address_and_offset(fd, ".eh_frame_hdr",
>> > + &dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_addr,
>> > + &dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_offset);
>> > + maps__for_each_entry(ui->thread->maps, map) {
>> > + if (map->dso == dso && map->start < addr_min)
>> > + addr_min = map->start;
>> > + }
>> > + dso->base_addr = addr_min - elf_base_address(fd);
>> > dso__data_put_fd(dso);
>> > + if (ret || dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_offset == 0)
>> > + return -EINVAL;
>> > }
>> >
>> > - if (offset)
>> > - ret = unwind_spec_ehframe(dso, machine, offset,
>> > - table_data, segbase,
>> > - fde_count);
>> > -
>> > - return ret;
>> > + *segbase = dso->base_addr + dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_addr;
>> > + ret = unwind_spec_ehframe(dso, ui->machine, dso->data.eh_frame_hdr_offset,
>> > + table_data, fde_count);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + return ret;
>> > + *table_data += *segbase;
>> > + return 0;
>> > }
>> >
>> > #ifndef NO_LIBUNWIND_DEBUG_FRAME
>> > @@ -388,14 +422,14 @@ find_proc_info(unw_addr_space_t as, unw_word_t ip, unw_proc_info_t *pi,
>> > pr_debug("unwind: find_proc_info dso %s\n", map->dso->name);
>> >
>> > /* Check the .eh_frame section for unwinding info */
>> > - if (!read_unwind_spec_eh_frame(map->dso, ui->machine,
>> > + if (!read_unwind_spec_eh_frame(map->dso, ui,
>> > &table_data, &segbase, &fde_count)) {
>> > memset(&di, 0, sizeof(di));
>> > di.format = UNW_INFO_FORMAT_REMOTE_TABLE;
>> > di.start_ip = map->start;
>> > di.end_ip = map->end;
>> > - di.u.rti.segbase = map->start + segbase - map->pgoff;
>> > - di.u.rti.table_data = map->start + table_data - map->pgoff;
>> > + di.u.rti.segbase = segbase;
>> > + di.u.rti.table_data = table_data;
>> > di.u.rti.table_len = fde_count * sizeof(struct table_entry)
>> > / sizeof(unw_word_t);
>> > ret = dwarf_search_unwind_table(as, ip, &di, pi,
>> > --
>> > 2.36.1.124.g0e6072fb45-goog
>> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists