linux-kernel - [PATCH 10/12] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220527063019.3112905-11-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 14:30:17 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 10/12] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller

Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into dmar_remove_one_dev_info() which
is its only caller. Make the spin lock critical range only cover the
device list change code and remove some unnecessary checks.

Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 34 +++++++++-------------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 6f3119c68cd2..d02ddd338afd 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -295,7 +295,6 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dmar_satc_units);
 static int g_num_of_iommus;
 
 static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev);
-static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info);
 
 int dmar_disabled = !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEFAULT_ON);
 int intel_iommu_sm = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SCALABLE_MODE_DEFAULT_ON);
@@ -4133,20 +4132,14 @@ static void domain_context_clear(struct device_domain_info *info)
 			       &domain_context_clear_one_cb, info);
 }
 
-static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
+static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
 {
-	struct dmar_domain *domain;
-	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
-
-	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-
-	if (WARN_ON(!info))
-		return;
-
-	iommu = info->iommu;
-	domain = info->domain;
+	struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+	struct dmar_domain *domain = info->domain;
+	struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
+	unsigned long flags;
 
-	if (info->dev && !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(info->dev)) {
+	if (!dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(info->dev)) {
 		if (dev_is_pci(info->dev) && sm_supported(iommu))
 			intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, info->dev,
 					PASID_RID2PASID, false);
@@ -4156,20 +4149,11 @@ static void __dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device_domain_info *info)
 		intel_pasid_free_table(info->dev);
 	}
 
-	list_del(&info->link);
-	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
-}
-
-static void dmar_remove_one_dev_info(struct device *dev)
-{
-	struct device_domain_info *info;
-	unsigned long flags;
-
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
-	info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
-	if (info)
-		__dmar_remove_one_dev_info(info);
+	list_del(&info->link);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+
+	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
 }
 
 static int md_domain_init(struct dmar_domain *domain, int guest_width)
-- 
2.25.1