[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9930ff36-90fe-d072-c1f1-5abf753feff4@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 09:58:00 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: liuke94@...wei.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
johannes@...solutions.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: Directly use ida_alloc()/free()
Le 27/05/2022 à 09:42, Kalle Valo a écrit :
> Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> writes:
>
>> Le 27/05/2022 à 09:41, keliu a écrit :
>>> Use ida_alloc()/ida_free() instead of deprecated
>>> ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_remove() .
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: keliu <liuke94-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@...lic.gmane.org>
>
> Heh, this email address got me confused :) I guess you (Christophe) use
> gmane and it's just some obfuscation done by gmane?
>
Yes, I use gname and thunderbird as a client. I also think that it is
some obfuscation done by gname.
This kind of obfuscation is not done on all messages, and not done
consistently on the message of the same ML. I don't know the rule that
is applied.
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists