[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6f64c75-053d-57e0-a997-176758523d9e@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 09:34:59 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
mike.kravetz@...cle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
songmuchun@...edance.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb: Remove unnecessary
huge_ptep_set_access_flags() in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte()
On 5/26/2022 3:01 PM, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 5/25/22 15:56, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> There is no need to update the hugetlb access flags after just setting the
>> hugetlb page table entry by set_huge_pte_at(), since the page table entry
>> value has no changes. Thus remove the unnecessary huge_ptep_set_access_flags()
>
> WARNING: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
> #9:
> value has no changes. Thus remove the unnecessary huge_ptep_set_access_flags()
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 8 lines checked
Sure, will remove checkpatch warning in next verion.
>
>> in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>
> Otherwise LGTM,
>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Thanks. Also thanks to Muchun and Mike for reviewing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists