[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7322d0d-ea60-d2e5-4ac2-df0077b25671@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 16:42:12 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, anshuman.khandual@....com,
naresh.kamboju@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/hugetlb: Fix building errors in
huge_ptep_clear_flush()
On 5/27/2022 3:12 PM, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Baolin,
>
> On 5/27/22 12:51 PM, Baolin Wang wrote:
>> Fix below building errors which was caused by commit ae07562909f3
>> ("mm: change huge_ptep_clear_flush() to return the original pte")
>> interacting with commit fb396bb459c1 ("arm64/hugetlb: Drop TLB flush
>> from get_clear_flush()").
>>
>> Due to the new get_clear_contig() has dropped TLB flush, we should
>> add an explicit TLB flush in huge_ptep_clear_flush() to keep original
>> semantics when changing to use new get_clear_contig().
>>
>> "
>> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c: In function ‘huge_ptep_clear_flush’:
>> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c:515:9: error: implicit declaration of
>> function ‘get_clear_flush’; did you mean ‘ptep_clear_flush’?
>> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> 515 | return get_clear_flush(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, pgsize,
>> ncontig);
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> | ptep_clear_flush
>> "
>>
>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>> Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>
> I ran to the compiling failure either and it would be caused by
> commit fb396bb459c1 ("arm64/hugetlb: Drop TLB flush from
> get_clear_flush()").
> It's worthy to have a "Fixes" tag. With those fixed:
Thanks for reminding. IMHO, better to add 2 related commits' fix tag.
Linus, could you help to add them when applying this patch, or need a
resend? Thanks.
Fixes: ae07562909f3 ("mm: change huge_ptep_clear_flush() to return the
original pte")
Fixes: fb396bb459c1 ("arm64/hugetlb: Drop TLB flush from
get_clear_flush()").
>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
>
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> index 0f0c17dfeb9c..e2a5ec9fdc0d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/hugetlbpage.c
>> @@ -507,12 +507,15 @@ pte_t huge_ptep_clear_flush(struct
>> vm_area_struct *vma,
>> {
>> size_t pgsize;
>> int ncontig;
>> + pte_t orig_pte;
>> if (!pte_cont(READ_ONCE(*ptep)))
>> return ptep_clear_flush(vma, addr, ptep);
>> ncontig = find_num_contig(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, &pgsize);
>> - return get_clear_flush(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, pgsize, ncontig);
>> + orig_pte = get_clear_contig(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep, pgsize,
>> ncontig);
>> + flush_tlb_range(vma, addr, addr + pgsize * ncontig);
>> + return orig_pte;
>> }
>> static int __init hugetlbpage_init(void)
>>
>
> Thanks,
> Gavin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists