linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] Removes the x86 dependency on the QAT drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YpCPulwFuNHHtw1V@silpixa00400314>
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 09:45:46 +0100
From:   Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@...el.com>
To:     Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Cc:     yoan.picchi@....com, ardb@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qat-linux@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] Removes the x86 dependency on the QAT drivers

On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 02:12:39PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> So testing this in BE is a bit more involved, and the practicality of such
> a setup is very questionable. If you are concerned, should we just say:
> 	depends on PCI && !CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
> At least until we have reports that confirm proper BE operation?
Sounds reasonable.

Thanks,

-- 
Giovanni