linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking/lockref: Use try_cmpxchg64 in CMPXCHG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 11:36:08 +0200
From:   Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Waiman.Long@...com,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] locking/lockref: Use try_cmpxchg64 in CMPXCHG_LOOP
 macro

On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 01:42:35PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:14:59PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 7:40 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Use try_cmpxchg64 instead of cmpxchg64 in CMPXCHG_LOOP macro.
> > >> x86 CMPXCHG instruction returns success in ZF flag, so this
> > >> change saves a compare after cmpxchg (and related move instruction
> > >> in front of cmpxchg). The main loop of lockref_get improves from:
> > >
> > > Ack on this one regardless of the 32-bit x86 question.
> > >
> > > HOWEVER.
> > >
> > > I'd like other architectures to pipe up too, because I think right now
> > > x86 is the only one that implements that "arch_try_cmpxchg()" family
> > > of operations natively, and I think the generic fallback for when it
> > > is missing might be kind of nasty.
> > >
> > > Maybe it ends up generating ok code, but it's also possible that it
> > > just didn't matter when it was only used in one place in the
> > > scheduler.
> > 
> > This patch seems to generate slightly *better* code on powerpc.
> > 
> > I see one register-to-register move that gets shifted slightly later, so
> > that it's skipped on the path that returns directly via the SUCCESS
> > case.
> 
> FWIW, I see the same on arm64; a register-to-register move gets moved out of
> the success path. That changes the register allocation, and resulting in one
> fewer move, but otherwise the code generation is the same.

Just for the records: s390 code generation changes the same like on
powerpc; so looks good.