linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: Skip check in kmemleak_*

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3b1542b95a3d322b798bf212b22c6c3567a76c13.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Fri, 27 May 2022 19:17:42 +0800
From:   Yee Lee <yee.lee@...iatek.com>
To:     patrick wang <patrick.wang.shcn@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <Kuan-Ying.lee@...iatek.com>,
        <Andrew.Yang@...iatek.com>, <Sunny.Kuo@...iatek.com>,
        <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: kmemleak: Skip check in kmemleak_*_phys when pfn
 bound is not ready

On Fri, 2022-05-27 at 18:20 +0800, patrick wang wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 11:25 AM <yee.lee@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > 
> > From: Yee Lee <yee.lee@...iatek.com>
> > 
> > In some archs (arm64), memblock allocates memory in boot time when
> > the pfn boundary (max_pfn/min_pfn) is not ready. The lowmen checks
> > in
> > kmemleak_*_phys() drop those blocks and cause some false leak
> > alarms
> > on common kernel objects.
> 
> If I understand correctly, if those blocks are dropped, they will
> not be added as kmemleak objects. So how could this affect
> other objects?
> 
> Thanks,
> Patrick

Yes, in fact, memblock needs those areas never reported as leaks and
add them as grey blocks. More detailed comments can be found inside
memblock_alloc_range_nid. 

> 
> > 
> > Kmemleak output: (Qemu/arm64)
> > unreferenced object 0xffff0000c0170a00 (size 128):
> >   comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294892404 (age 126.208s)
> >   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >     62 61 73 65 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00  base............
> >     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> > 00  ................
> >   backtrace:
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x1b0/0x2e4
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] kstrdup_const+0x8c/0xc4
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] kvasprintf_const+0xbc/0xec
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x58/0xe4
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] kobject_add+0x84/0x100
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] __of_attach_node_sysfs+0x78/0xec
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] of_core_init+0x68/0x104
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] driver_init+0x28/0x48
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] do_basic_setup+0x14/0x28
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] kernel_init_freeable+0x110/0x178
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] kernel_init+0x20/0x1a0
> >     [<(____ptrval____)>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> > 
> > This patch relaxs the boundary checking in kmemleak_*_phys api
> > if max_low_pfn is uninitialzed.
> > 
> > Fixes: 23c2d4 (mm: kmemleak: take a full lowmem check in
> > kmemleak_*_phy)
> > Signed-off-by: Yee Lee <yee.lee@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/kmemleak.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> > index a182f5ddaf68..6b2af544aa0f 100644
> > --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> > +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> > @@ -1132,7 +1132,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_no_scan);
> >  void __ref kmemleak_alloc_phys(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size, int
> > min_count,
> >                                gfp_t gfp)
> >  {
> > -       if (PHYS_PFN(phys) >= min_low_pfn && PHYS_PFN(phys) <
> > max_low_pfn)
> > +       if (!max_low_pfn || (PHYS_PFN(phys) >= min_low_pfn &&
> > PHYS_PFN(phys) < max_low_pfn))
> >                 kmemleak_alloc(__va(phys), size, min_count, gfp);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_alloc_phys);
> > @@ -1146,7 +1146,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_alloc_phys);
> >   */
> >  void __ref kmemleak_free_part_phys(phys_addr_t phys, size_t size)
> >  {
> > -       if (PHYS_PFN(phys) >= min_low_pfn && PHYS_PFN(phys) <
> > max_low_pfn)
> > +       if (!max_low_pfn || (PHYS_PFN(phys) >= min_low_pfn &&
> > PHYS_PFN(phys) < max_low_pfn))
> >                 kmemleak_free_part(__va(phys), size);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_free_part_phys);
> > @@ -1158,7 +1158,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_free_part_phys);
> >   */
> >  void __ref kmemleak_not_leak_phys(phys_addr_t phys)
> >  {
> > -       if (PHYS_PFN(phys) >= min_low_pfn && PHYS_PFN(phys) <
> > max_low_pfn)
> > +       if (!max_low_pfn || (PHYS_PFN(phys) >= min_low_pfn &&
> > PHYS_PFN(phys) < max_low_pfn))
> >                 kmemleak_not_leak(__va(phys));
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_not_leak_phys);
> > @@ -1170,7 +1170,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_not_leak_phys);
> >   */
> >  void __ref kmemleak_ignore_phys(phys_addr_t phys)
> >  {
> > -       if (PHYS_PFN(phys) >= min_low_pfn && PHYS_PFN(phys) <
> > max_low_pfn)
> > +       if (!max_low_pfn || (PHYS_PFN(phys) >= min_low_pfn &&
> > PHYS_PFN(phys) < max_low_pfn))
> >                 kmemleak_ignore(__va(phys));
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmemleak_ignore_phys);
> > --
> > 2.18.0
> >