[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220527084844.246754865@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 10:49:56 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 116/163] random: check for signals every PAGE_SIZE chunk of /dev/[u]random
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
commit e3c1c4fd9e6d14059ed93ebfe15e1c57793b1a05 upstream.
In 1448769c9cdb ("random: check for signal_pending() outside of
need_resched() check"), Jann pointed out that we previously were only
checking the TIF_NOTIFY_SIGNAL and TIF_SIGPENDING flags if the process
had TIF_NEED_RESCHED set, which meant in practice, super long reads to
/dev/[u]random would delay signal handling by a long time. I tried this
using the below program, and indeed I wasn't able to interrupt a
/dev/urandom read until after several megabytes had been read. The bug
he fixed has always been there, and so code that reads from /dev/urandom
without checking the return value of read() has mostly worked for a long
time, for most sizes, not just for <= 256.
Maybe it makes sense to keep that code working. The reason it was so
small prior, ignoring the fact that it didn't work anyway, was likely
because /dev/random used to block, and that could happen for pretty
large lengths of time while entropy was gathered. But now, it's just a
chacha20 call, which is extremely fast and is just operating on pure
data, without having to wait for some external event. In that sense,
/dev/[u]random is a lot more like /dev/zero.
Taking a page out of /dev/zero's read_zero() function, it always returns
at least one chunk, and then checks for signals after each chunk. Chunk
sizes there are of length PAGE_SIZE. Let's just copy the same thing for
/dev/[u]random, and check for signals and cond_resched() for every
PAGE_SIZE amount of data. This makes the behavior more consistent with
expectations, and should mitigate the impact of Jann's fix for the
age-old signal check bug.
---- test program ----
#include <unistd.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/random.h>
static unsigned char x[~0U];
static void handle(int) { }
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
pid_t pid = getpid(), child;
signal(SIGUSR1, handle);
if (!(child = fork())) {
for (;;)
kill(pid, SIGUSR1);
}
pause();
printf("interrupted after reading %zd bytes\n", getrandom(x, sizeof(x), 0));
kill(child, SIGTERM);
return 0;
}
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/char/random.c | 17 +++++++----------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -525,7 +525,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_random_bytes);
static ssize_t get_random_bytes_user(void __user *buf, size_t nbytes)
{
- bool large_request = nbytes > 256;
ssize_t ret = 0;
size_t len;
u32 chacha_state[CHACHA_STATE_WORDS];
@@ -551,15 +550,6 @@ static ssize_t get_random_bytes_user(voi
}
do {
- if (large_request) {
- if (signal_pending(current)) {
- if (!ret)
- ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
- break;
- }
- cond_resched();
- }
-
chacha20_block(chacha_state, output);
if (unlikely(chacha_state[12] == 0))
++chacha_state[13];
@@ -573,6 +563,13 @@ static ssize_t get_random_bytes_user(voi
nbytes -= len;
buf += len;
ret += len;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(PAGE_SIZE % CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE != 0);
+ if (!(ret % PAGE_SIZE) && nbytes) {
+ if (signal_pending(current))
+ break;
+ cond_resched();
+ }
} while (nbytes);
memzero_explicit(output, sizeof(output));
Powered by blists - more mailing lists