lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 28 May 2022 09:52:14 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Cc:     martin.botka@...ainline.org,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
        marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, jamipkettunen@...ainline.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
        Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Akhil P Oommen <quic_akhilpo@...cinc.com>,
        Vladimir Lypak <vladimir.lypak@...il.com>,
        Emma Anholt <emma@...olt.net>,
        Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/msm/adreno: Fix up formatting

On Sat, 2022-05-28 at 18:03 +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> Leading spaces are not something checkpatch likes, and it says so when
> they are present. Use tabs consistently to indent function body and
> unwrap a 83-char-long line, as 100 is cool nowadays.

unassociated trivia:

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/adreno_gpu.h
[]
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a420(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>  
>  static inline int adreno_is_a430(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>  {
> -       return gpu->revn == 430;
> +	return gpu->revn == 430;
>  }

looks like these could/should return bool

>  static inline int adreno_is_a506(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
> @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static inline int adreno_is_a540(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>  
>  static inline int adreno_is_a618(struct adreno_gpu *gpu)
>  {
> -       return gpu->revn == 618;
> +	return gpu->revn == 618;
>  }

etc...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ