[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2DRBrDmfhz2GbMOqNBufNKS7K7XyeE1Px3AhqAuSZD4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 23:08:54 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
Shiraz Hashim <shiraz.linux.kernel@...il.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: mainline build failure due to f1e4c916f97f ("drm/edid: add EDID
block count and size helpers")
On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 10:31 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 11:59 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> >
> > It's CONFIG_ARM_AEABI, which is normally set everywhere. Without this
> > option, you the kernel is built for the old 'OABI' that forces all non-packed
> > struct members to be at least 16-bit aligned.
>
> Looks like forced word (32 bit) alignment to me.
Ah, of course, I keep mixing it up with the odd structure alignment of m68k,
which does the opposite and aligns struct members to no more than 16 bits.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists