[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220527231856.14000ed1@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2022 23:18:56 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ftrace: Add FTRACE_MCOUNT_MAX_OFFSET to avoid adding
weak function
On Fri, 27 May 2022 16:32:05 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> @@ -4003,7 +4128,11 @@ ftrace_match_record(struct dyn_ftrace *rec, struct ftrace_glob *func_g,
> char str[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
> char *modname;
>
> - kallsyms_lookup(rec->ip, NULL, NULL, &modname, str);
> + if (lookup_ip(rec->ip, &modname, str)) {
> + /* This should only happen when a rec is disabled */
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(!(rec->flags & FTRACE_FL_DISABLED));
It appears that some of the start up tests can call this before the
workqueue sets it to DISABLED, so we need to not WARN_ON() here. :-/
-- Steve
> + return 0;
> + }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists