[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGphcdnPnFeafky=8-vyd_wKgbuTJc+MOb9UsM_0P-hVL_oiMQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 16:45:48 +0300
From: Roman Stratiienko <r.stratiienko@...il.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
Cc: wens@...e.org,
Jernej Škrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
airlied@...ux.ie, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, megi@....cz,
Roman Stratiienko <roman.o.stratiienko@...ballogic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: Fix blend route/enable register corruption for DE2.0/DE3.0
Hi Maxime,
пн, 30 мая 2022 г. в 16:22, Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>:
>
> Hi Roman,
>
> On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 11:54:45AM +0000, Roman Stratiienko wrote:
> > By this commit 2 related issues are solved:
> >
> > Issue #1. Corruption in blend route/enable register:
> >
> > Register corruption happens after using old_state->zpos to disable layer
> > state. Blend route/enable registers are shared with other layers
> > and other layers may have already assigned this PIPE to valid value.
> >
> > Solution: Do not use old_state->zpos to disable the plane pipe in
> > blend registers.
> >
> > Issue #2. Remove disabled layer from blend route/enable registers:
> >
> > Since sun4i/drm are using normalized_zpos, .atomic_update() will setup
> > blend route/enable pipes starting from PIPE0 to PIPEX, where X+1 is a
> > number of layers used by the CRTC in this frame.
> >
> > Remaining pipes (PIPE[X+1] - PIPE[MAX]) can have old data that MUST be
> > updated.
> >
> > new_state->normalized_zpos can't be used, since drm helpers won't update
> > it for disabled planes.
> >
> > Solution:
> >
> > 1. Track the number of total used planes for crtc.
> > 2. Use this number instead of zpos to disable unused blend pipes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roman Stratiienko <roman.o.stratiienko@...ballogic.com>
>
> If there's two issues, and two solutions, it should be two patches.
I would say.. It's a single complex issue.
Solving one part without solving another will make things only worse.
>
> Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists