[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f284612d-c511-9a31-3e0a-e4fb1cc77c6e@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 08:47:13 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>, broonie@...nel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
thierry.reding@...il.com, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com
Cc: jonathanh@...dia.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ASoC: tegra: Add binding doc for OPE module
On 30/05/2022 06:21, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-mbdrc.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/sound/nvidia,tegra210-mbdrc.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Tegra210 MBDRC Device Tree Bindings
>> Previous comments - s/Device Tree Bindings//
>> - still applies. Please do not ignore it.
>
> I did not ignore this. There was a comment from Mark on this earlier (v1) and I did not see further reply from you. I thought you were OK with the way it is. So if you are saying acronym part is OK and just to remove "Device Tree Bindings" I can send a v3 for this.
Yes, acronym is okay. Just remove the "Device Tree Bindings".
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists