[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4aa518425958496e763294023ac950837ff8eac3.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 09:40:43 +0200
From: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com,
thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
scgl@...ux.ibm.com, mimu@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 04/19] KVM: s390: pv: refactor s390_reset_acc
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 18:11 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
[...]
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > > index e8904cb9dc38..a3a1f90f6ec1 100644
> > > --- a/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > > +++ b/arch/s390/mm/gmap.c
> > > @@ -2676,44 +2676,81 @@ void s390_reset_cmma(struct mm_struct
> > > *mm)
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(s390_reset_cmma);
> > >
> > > -/*
> > > - * make inaccessible pages accessible again
> > > - */
> > > -static int __s390_reset_acc(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long addr,
> > > - unsigned long next, struct mm_walk
> > > *walk)
> > > +#define DESTROY_LOOP_THRESHOLD 32
> >
> > maybe GATHER_NUM_PAGE_REFS_TO_TAKE?
>
> what about GATHER_GET_PAGES ?
Yes, that's good as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists