[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220530113953.v3.2.I692165059274c30b59bed56940b54a573ccb46e4@changeid>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 11:39:58 +1000
From: Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, miklos@...redi.hu,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org, tytso@....edu
Cc: fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] FUSE: Retire superblock on force unmount
Force unmount of FUSE severes the connection with the user space, even
if there are still open files. Subsequent remount tries to re-use the
superblock held by the open files, which is meaningless in the FUSE case
after disconnect - reused super block doesn't have userspace counterpart
attached to it and is incapable of doing any IO.
Signed-off-by: Daniil Lunev <dlunev@...omium.org>
---
Changes in v3:
- No changes
Changes in v2:
- Use an exported function instead of directly modifying superblock
fs/fuse/inode.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fuse/inode.c b/fs/fuse/inode.c
index 8c0665c5dff88..8875361544b2a 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/inode.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/inode.c
@@ -476,8 +476,11 @@ static void fuse_umount_begin(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct fuse_conn *fc = get_fuse_conn_super(sb);
- if (!fc->no_force_umount)
- fuse_abort_conn(fc);
+ if (fc->no_force_umount)
+ return;
+
+ fuse_abort_conn(fc);
+ retire_super(sb);
}
static void fuse_send_destroy(struct fuse_mount *fm)
--
2.31.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists