[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff5f394db586169fe6dc16dc0e24d534e4825caa.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 10:11:37 +0200
From: Nico Boehr <nrb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
pasic@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, scgl@...ux.ibm.com,
mimu@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 14/19] KVM: s390: pv: cleanup leftover protected VMs
if needed
On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 10:03 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> index bd850be08c86..b20f2cbd43d9 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,19 @@
[...]
> +/**
> + * @struct deferred_priv
> + * Represents a "leftover" protected VM that is still registered
> with the
> + * Ultravisor, but which does not correspond any longer to an active
> KVM VM.
> + */
> +struct deferred_priv {
Why not just name this leftover_vm?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists