lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74a6159b-40d0-bbc3-5b4a-ebf6ed98bac7@collabora.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 May 2022 10:34:19 +0200
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Nícolas F. R. A. Prado 
        <nfraprado@...labora.com>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     kernel@...labora.com,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] MT8192 pinctrl properties adjustments

Il 25/05/22 17:57, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado ha scritto:
> 
> The two patches in this series substitute properties in the mt8192
> pinctrl dt-binding for ones which have a clearer meaning and are more
> standardized. At this point there's no DT using the mt8192 pinctrl
> binding, so if such changes are to be made, they need to happen now.
> 
> 
> Nícolas F. R. A. Prado (2):
>    dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8192: Add drive-strength-microamp
>    dt-bindings: pinctrl: mt8192: Use generic bias instead of pull-*-adv
> 
>   .../bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-mt8192.yaml      | 58 ++++++-------------
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> 

Hey Nic,

As you know, I definitely agree with these changes, but they don't deserve
to get any Fixes tag: backporting should be useless in this case... and you
anyway aren't fixing a faulty binding.

Cheers!
Angelo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ