[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220530102859.GA32111@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 12:28:59 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 04/33] Input: stmfts - fix reference leak in
stmfts_input_open
Hi!
> > > From: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>
> > >
> > > [ Upstream commit 26623eea0da3476446909af96c980768df07bbd9 ]
> > >
> > > pm_runtime_get_sync() will increment pm usage counter even it
> > > failed. Forgetting to call pm_runtime_put_noidle will result
> > > in reference leak in stmfts_input_open, so we should fix it.
> >
> > This is wrong, AFAICT.
>
> Yes, I think you are right. How about below?
Looks good to me.
> Input: stmfts - do not leave device disabled in stmfts_input_open
>
> From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
>
> The commit 26623eea0da3 attempted to deal with potential leak of runtime
> PM counter when opening the touchscreen device, however it ended up
> erroneously dropping the counter in the case of successfully enabling the
> device.
>
> Let's address this by using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() and then executing
> pm_runtime_put_sync() only when we fail to send "sense on" command to the
> device.
>
> Fixes: 26623eea0da3 ("Input: stmfts - fix reference leak in stmfts_input_open")
Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Thank you,
Pavel
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists