linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ext4: support flex_bg in ext4_mb_normalize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 May 2022 10:35:13 +0800
From:   Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To:     Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <tytso@....edu>,
        <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>, <lczerner@...hat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        <yebin10@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
        Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ext4: support flex_bg in ext4_mb_normalize_request

在 2022/5/28 23:09, Ritesh Harjani 写道:
> On 22/05/28 07:00PM, Baokun Li wrote:
>> In ext4_mb_normalize_request, the size of the allocation request is
>> limited to no more than EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP. Ritesh mentions that this
>> does not take into account the case of flex_bg groups. So we should add
>> support for flex_bg to make the physical blocks of large files contiguous.
> My only concern here was that what if we are at the flex group end boundary and
> decide to take the size as of flex group size. How are we detecting that case.
>
> But, I haven't yet looked at this patch of yours (as I am on travel for next few days),
> but if this requires further discussion, we can work on this seperately and let
> the other two patches go in as those are part of the bug fixes which you
> identified (just my thoughts).
>
> -ritesh
> .

All right, work on this separately.

Have a nice trip!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li