[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220530031604.144875-1-liuyacan@corp.netease.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 11:16:04 +0800
From: liuyacan@...p.netease.com
To: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ubraun@...ux.ibm.com,
tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: SMC-R problem under multithread
Hi experts,
I recently used memcached to test the performance of SMC-R relative to TCP, but the results
are confusing me. When using multithread on the server side, the performance of SMC-R is not as good as TCP.
Specifically, I tested 4 scenarios with server thread: 1\2\4\8. The client uses 8threads fixedly.
server: (smc_run) memcached -t 1 -m 16384 -p [SERVER-PORT] -U 0 -F -c 10240 -o modern
client: (smc-run) memtier_benchmark -s [SERVER-IP] -p [SERVER-PORT] -P memcache_text --random-data --data-size=100 --data-size-pattern=S --key-minimum=30 --key-maximum=100 -n 5000000 -t 8
The result is as follows:
SMC-R:
server-thread ops/sec client-cpu server-cpu
1 242k 220% 97%
2 362k 241% 128%
4 378k 242% 160%
8 395k 242% 210%
TCP:
server-thread ops/sec client-cpu server-cpu
1 185k 224% 100%
2 435k 479% 200%
4 780k 731% 400%
8 938k 800% 659%
It can be seen that as the number of threads increases, the performance increase of SMC-R is much slower than that of TCP.
Am I doing something wrong? Or is it only when CPU resources are tight that SMC-R has a significant advantage ?
Any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks & Regards,
Yacan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists