linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: reduce the rcu lock duration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220530113016.16663-2-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 30 May 2022 19:30:13 +0800
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
CC:     <peterx@...hat.com>, <apopple@...dia.com>, <ying.huang@...el.com>,
        <osalvador@...e.de>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        <songmuchun@...edance.com>, <hch@....de>, <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        <cl@...ux.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/4] mm: reduce the rcu lock duration

Commit 3268c63eded4 ("mm: fix move/migrate_pages() race on task struct")
extends the period of the rcu_read_lock until after the permissions checks
are done to prevent the task pointed to from changing from under us. But
the task_struct refcount is also taken at that time, the reference to task
is guaranteed to be stable. So it's unnecessary to extend the period of
the rcu_read_lock. Release the rcu lock after task refcount is successfully
grabbed to reduce the rcu holding time.

Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c | 3 +--
 mm/migrate.c   | 3 +--
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 0b4ba3ee810e..2dad094177bf 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -1609,6 +1609,7 @@ static int kernel_migrate_pages(pid_t pid, unsigned long maxnode,
 		goto out;
 	}
 	get_task_struct(task);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	err = -EINVAL;
 
@@ -1617,11 +1618,9 @@ static int kernel_migrate_pages(pid_t pid, unsigned long maxnode,
 	 * Use the regular "ptrace_may_access()" checks.
 	 */
 	if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 		err = -EPERM;
 		goto out_put;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	task_nodes = cpuset_mems_allowed(task);
 	/* Is the user allowed to access the target nodes? */
diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
index e51588e95f57..e88ebb88fa6f 100644
--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -1902,17 +1902,16 @@ static struct mm_struct *find_mm_struct(pid_t pid, nodemask_t *mem_nodes)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ESRCH);
 	}
 	get_task_struct(task);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	/*
 	 * Check if this process has the right to modify the specified
 	 * process. Use the regular "ptrace_may_access()" checks.
 	 */
 	if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ_REALCREDS)) {
-		rcu_read_unlock();
 		mm = ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
 		goto out;
 	}
-	rcu_read_unlock();
 
 	mm = ERR_PTR(security_task_movememory(task));
 	if (IS_ERR(mm))
-- 
2.23.0