[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEubfv_OJOsJ_ROgei41Qx4mPO0Xz8rMVnO8aPFiEqr8rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 11:39:21 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>,
Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"martinh@...inx.com" <martinh@...inx.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"martinpo@...inx.com" <martinpo@...inx.com>,
"lvivier@...hat.com" <lvivier@...hat.com>,
"pabloc@...inx.com" <pabloc@...inx.com>,
Eli Cohen <elic@...dia.com>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Zhang Min <zhang.min9@....com.cn>,
Wu Zongyong <wuzongyong@...ux.alibaba.com>,
"lulu@...hat.com" <lulu@...hat.com>,
Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>,
"Piotr.Uminski@...el.com" <Piotr.Uminski@...el.com>,
Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@...cle.com>,
"ecree.xilinx@...il.com" <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
"gautam.dawar@....com" <gautam.dawar@....com>,
"habetsm.xilinx@...il.com" <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>,
"tanuj.kamde@....com" <tanuj.kamde@....com>,
"hanand@...inx.com" <hanand@...inx.com>,
"dinang@...inx.com" <dinang@...inx.com>,
Longpeng <longpeng2@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Implement vdpasim stop operation
On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 6:56 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 12:54:32PM +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >
> >
> > > From: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@...hat.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2022 8:44 AM
> >
> > > Implement stop operation for vdpa_sim devices, so vhost-vdpa will offer
> > >
> > > that backend feature and userspace can effectively stop the device.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > This is a must before get virtqueue indexes (base) for live migration,
> > >
> > > since the device could modify them after userland gets them. There are
> > >
> > > individual ways to perform that action for some devices
> > >
> > > (VHOST_NET_SET_BACKEND, VHOST_VSOCK_SET_RUNNING, ...) but there
> > > was no
> > >
> > > way to perform it for any vhost device (and, in particular, vhost-vdpa).
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > After the return of ioctl with stop != 0, the device MUST finish any
> > >
> > > pending operations like in flight requests. It must also preserve all
> > >
> > > the necessary state (the virtqueue vring base plus the possible device
> > >
> > > specific states) that is required for restoring in the future. The
> > >
> > > device must not change its configuration after that point.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > After the return of ioctl with stop == 0, the device can continue
> > >
> > > processing buffers as long as typical conditions are met (vq is enabled,
> > >
> > > DRIVER_OK status bit is enabled, etc).
> >
> > Just to be clear, we are adding vdpa level new ioctl() that doesn’t map to any mechanism in the virtio spec.
> >
> > Why can't we use this ioctl() to indicate driver to start/stop the device instead of driving it through the driver_ok?
> > This is in the context of other discussion we had in the LM series.
>
> If there's something in the spec that does this then let's use that.
Actually, we try to propose a independent feature here:
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-dev/202111/msg00020.html
Does it make sense to you?
Thanks
> Unfortunately the LM series seems to be stuck on moving
> bits around with the admin virtqueue ...
>
> --
> MST
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists