linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] EADDRINUSE from bind() on application restart after killing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 30 May 2022 18:15:03 +0500
From:   Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     usama.anjum@...labora.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
        Paul Gofman <pgofman@...eweavers.com>,
        "open list:NETWORKING [TCP]" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sami Farin <hvtaifwkbgefbaei@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] EADDRINUSE from bind() on application restart after killing

Hi,

Thank you for your reply.

On 5/25/22 3:13 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 1:19 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> We have a set of processes which talk with each other through a local
>> TCP socket. If the process(es) are killed (through SIGKILL) and
>> restarted at once, the bind() fails with EADDRINUSE error. This error
>> only appears if application is restarted at once without waiting for 60
>> seconds or more. It seems that there is some timeout of 60 seconds for
>> which the previous TCP connection remains alive waiting to get closed
>> completely. In that duration if we try to connect again, we get the error.
>>
>> We are able to avoid this error by adding SO_REUSEADDR attribute to the
>> socket in a hack. But this hack cannot be added to the application
>> process as we don't own it.
>>
>> I've looked at the TCP connection states after killing processes in
>> different ways. The TCP connection ends up in 2 different states with
>> timeouts:
>>
>> (1) Timeout associated with FIN_WAIT_1 state which is set through
>> `tcp_fin_timeout` in procfs (60 seconds by default)
>>
>> (2) Timeout associated with TIME_WAIT state which cannot be changed. It
>> seems like this timeout has come from RFC 1337.
>>
>> The timeout in (1) can be changed. Timeout in (2) cannot be changed. It
>> also doesn't seem feasible to change the timeout of TIME_WAIT state as
>> the RFC mentions several hazards. But we are talking about a local TCP
>> connection where maybe those hazards aren't applicable directly? Is it
>> possible to change timeout for TIME_WAIT state for only local
>> connections without any hazards?
>>
>> We have tested a hack where we replace timeout of TIME_WAIT state from a
>> value in procfs for local connections. This solves our problem and
>> application starts to work without any modifications to it.
>>
>> The question is that what can be the best possible solution here? Any
>> thoughts will be very helpful.
>>
> 
> One solution would be to extend TCP diag to support killing TIME_WAIT sockets.
> (This has been raised recently anyway)
I think this has been raised here:
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ba65f579-4e69-ae0d-4770-bc6234beb428@gmail.com/

> 
> Then you could zap all sockets, before re-starting your program.
> 
> ss -K -ta src :listen_port
> 
> Untested patch:
The following command and patch work for my use case. The socket in
TIME_WAIT_2 or TIME_WAIT state are closed when zapped.

Can you please upstream this patch?

> 
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 9984d23a7f3e1353d2e1fc9053d98c77268c577e..1b7bde889096aa800b2994c64a3a68edf3b62434
> 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -4519,6 +4519,15 @@ int tcp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
>                         local_bh_enable();
>                         return 0;
>                 }
> +               if (sk->sk_state == TCP_TIME_WAIT) {
> +                       struct inet_timewait_sock *tw = inet_twsk(sk);
> +
> +                       refcount_inc(&tw->tw_refcnt);
> +                       local_bh_disable();
> +                       inet_twsk_deschedule_put(tw);
> +                       local_bh_enable();
> +                       return 0;
> +               }
>                 return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>         }

-- 
Muhammad Usama Anjum