[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1653998201-10230-1-git-send-email-wangming01@loongson.cn>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 19:56:41 +0800
From: Ming Wang <wangming01@...ngson.cn>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1] sched: there is no need to call switch_mm_irqs_off when sched between two user thread.
When condition (prev->active_mm == next->mm && !prev->mm) is met,
the situation is as follows:
user thread -> user thread
There is not need switch_mm when sched between two user thread.
Because they share the mm_struct. This can provide better
performance when testing UnixBench.
Signed-off-by: Ming Wang <wangming01@...ngson.cn>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 696c649..9d7f6fb 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5099,7 +5099,8 @@ asmlinkage __visible void schedule_tail(struct task_struct *prev)
* case 'prev->active_mm == next->mm' through
* finish_task_switch()'s mmdrop().
*/
- switch_mm_irqs_off(prev->active_mm, next->mm, next);
+ if ((prev->active_mm != next->mm) || (!prev->mm))
+ switch_mm_irqs_off(prev->active_mm, next->mm, next);
if (!prev->mm) { // from kernel
/* will mmdrop() in finish_task_switch(). */
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists