[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YpYaYK7a28DFT5Ne@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 15:38:40 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jack Allister <jalliste@...zon.com>
Cc: diapop@...zon.co.uk, metikaya@...zon.co.uk,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: CPU frequency scaling for intel x86_64 KVM
guests
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:59:25AM +0000, Jack Allister wrote:
> A VMM can control a vCPU's CPU frequency by interfacing with KVM via
> the vCPU file descriptor to enable/set CPU frequency scaling for a
> guest. Instead of creating a separate IOCTL to this this, KVM capabil-
> ities are extended to include a capability called
> KVM_CAP_CPU_FREQ_SCALING.
>
> A generic set_cpu_freq interface is added to kvm_x86_ops
> to allow for architecture (AMD/Intel) independent CPU frequency
> scaling setting.
>
> For Intel platforms, Hardware-Controlled Performance States (HWP) are
> used to implement CPU scaling within the guest. Further information on
> this mechanism can be seen in Intel SDM Vol 3B (section 14.4). The CPU
> frequency is set as soon as this function is called and is kept running
> until explicitly reset or set again.
>
> Currently the AMD frequency setting interface is left unimplemented.
>
> Please note that CPU frequency scaling will have an effect on host
> processing in it's current form. To change back to full performance
> when running in host context an IOCTL with a frequency value of 0
> is needed to run back at uncapped speed.
Nowhere does this explain *WHY* we would want to do this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists