[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <270c2315-7ba5-4bbb-ee5c-38cc8a57e628@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 21:55:23 +0800
From: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
odin@...d.al, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
duanxiongchun@...edance.com, songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] sched/fair: optimize and simplify
rq leaf_cfs_rq_list
Hi,
On 2022/5/30 15:52, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Thu, 26 May 2022 at 12:40, Chengming Zhou
> <zhouchengming@...edance.com> wrote:
>>
[...]
>> @@ -11257,9 +11218,10 @@ static inline bool vruntime_normalized(struct task_struct *p)
>> */
>> static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
>> {
>> - struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
>> + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>>
>> - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq_of(se));
>> + if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
>> + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>>
>> /* Start to propagate at parent */
>> se = se->parent;
>> @@ -11268,7 +11230,8 @@ static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
>> cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
>>
>
> you can break if the cfs is throttled because it's sched_entity has
> been dequeued. In this case we check if the cfs is throttled not if
> the hierarchy is throttled
>
> + if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
> + break;
>
This propagate part still make me confused. :-)
I wonder if you think we should change like this:
static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) --> break if cfs is throttled
return;
if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
/* Start to propagate at parent */
se = se->parent;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) --> break if cfs is throttled
break;
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG); --> throttled cfs_rq->prop not updated
if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
}
If I understand right, we should update_load_avg() until cfs_rq_throttled(),
including that throttled cfs_rq? So we can go on propagating when unthrottle.
Maybe like this?
static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) --> break if cfs is throttled
return;
if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
/* Start to propagate at parent */
se = se->parent;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG); --> update throttled cfs_rq->prop
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)) --> break if cfs is throttled
break;
if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
}
Thanks!
>> update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
>> - list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>> + if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
>> + list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
>> }
>> }
>> #else
>> --
>> 2.36.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists