linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/12] iommu/vt-d: Use iommu_get_domain_for

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a7d6d830-cb06-e0d7-0688-028f9af900e5@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 16:01:04 +0100
From:   Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] iommu/vt-d: Use iommu_get_domain_for_dev() in
 debugfs

On 2022-05-31 15:53, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 10:11:18PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>> On 2022/5/31 21:10, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 11:02:06AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
>>>
>>>> For case 2, it is a bit weird. I tried to add a rwsem lock to make the
>>>> iommu_unmap() and dumping tables in debugfs exclusive. This does not
>>>> work because debugfs may depend on the DMA of the devices to work. It
>>>> seems that what we can do is to allow this race, but when we traverse
>>>> the page table in debugfs, we will check the validity of the physical
>>>> address retrieved from the page table entry. Then, the worst case is to
>>>> print some useless information.
>>>
>>> Sounds horrible, don't you have locking around the IOPTEs of some
>>> kind? How does updating them work reliably?
>>
>> There's no locking around updating the IOPTEs. The basic assumption is
>> that at any time, there's only a single thread manipulating the mappings
>> of the range specified in iommu_map/unmap() APIs. Therefore, the race
>> only exists when multiple ranges share some high-level IOPTEs. The IOMMU
>> driver updates those IOPTEs using the compare-and-exchange atomic
>> operation.
> 
> Oh? Did I miss where that was documented as part of the iommu API?
> 
> Daniel posted patches for VFIO to multi-thread iommu_domin mapping.
> 
> iommufd goes out of its way to avoid this kind of serialization so
> that userspace can parallel map IOVA.
> 
> I think if this is the requirement then the iommu API needs to
> provide a lock around the domain for the driver..

Eww, no, we can't kill performance by forcing serialisation on the 
entire API just for one silly driver-internal debugfs corner :(

Robin.