linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add PROG_TEST_RUN selftest for BPF_PROG_TYPE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPhsuW6eQXZrnJdRGUEu6jQAjpXnEB_f4bzBF1rXst4LWBWd=g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 10:11:21 -0700
From:   Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
To:     Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add PROG_TEST_RUN selftest
 for BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 3:06 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz> wrote:
>
> This commit adds a selftest to test that we can both PROG_TEST_RUN a
> kprobe prog and set its context.

nit: per Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:

Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
its behaviour.

>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>

Other than that,

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>


> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c     | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c  | 33 +++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 90 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..260966fd4506
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kprobe_ctx.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <linux/ptrace.h>
> +#include "kprobe_ctx.skel.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * x86_64 happens to be one of the architectures that exports the
> + * kernel `struct pt_regs` to userspace ABI. For the architectures
> + * that don't, users will have to extract `struct pt_regs` from vmlinux
> + * BTF in order to use BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE's BPF_PROG_RUN functionality.
> + *
> + * We choose to only test x86 here to keep the test simple.
> + */
> +void test_kprobe_ctx(void)
> +{
> +#ifdef __x86_64__
> +       struct pt_regs regs = {
> +               .rdi = 1,
> +               .rsi = 2,
> +               .rdx = 3,
> +               .rcx = 4,
> +               .r8 = 5,
> +       };
> +
> +       LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, tattr,
> +               .ctx_in = &regs,
> +               .ctx_size_in = sizeof(regs),
> +       );
> +
> +       struct kprobe_ctx *skel = NULL;
> +       int prog_fd;
> +       int err;
> +
> +       skel = kprobe_ctx__open_and_load();
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
> +               return;
> +
> +       skel->bss->expected_p1 = (void *)1;
> +       skel->bss->expected_p2 = (void *)2;
> +       skel->bss->expected_p3 = (void *)3;
> +       skel->bss->expected_p4 = (void *)4;
> +       skel->bss->expected_p5 = (void *)5;
> +
> +       prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.prog);
> +       err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &tattr);
> +       if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       if (!ASSERT_TRUE(skel->bss->ret, "ret"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +
> +       if (!ASSERT_GT(tattr.duration, 0, "duration"))
> +               goto cleanup;
> +cleanup:
> +       kprobe_ctx__destroy(skel);
> +#endif
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..98063c549930
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kprobe_ctx.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +
> +#include "vmlinux.h"
> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> +
> +volatile void *expected_p1;
> +volatile void *expected_p2;
> +volatile void *expected_p3;
> +volatile void *expected_p4;
> +volatile void *expected_p5;
> +volatile bool ret = false;
> +
> +SEC("kprobe/this_function_does_not_exist")
> +int prog(struct pt_regs *ctx)
> +{
> +       void *p1, *p2, *p3, *p4, *p5;
> +
> +       p1 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM1(ctx);
> +       p2 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM2(ctx);
> +       p3 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM3(ctx);
> +       p4 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM4(ctx);
> +       p5 = (void *)PT_REGS_PARM5(ctx);
> +
> +       if (p1 != expected_p1 || p2 != expected_p2 || p3 != expected_p3 ||
> +           p4 != expected_p4 || p5 != expected_p5)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       ret = true;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> --
> 2.36.1
>