linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 5/9] cxl/port: Find a DOE mailbox which supports CDAT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220531175716.jlkwu7aerxh5ucte@mail.bwidawsk.net>
Date:   Tue, 31 May 2022 10:57:16 -0700
From:   Ben Widawsky <ben@...dawsk.net>
To:     ira.weiny@...el.com
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 5/9] cxl/port: Find a DOE mailbox which supports CDAT

On 22-05-31 08:26:28, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> 
> Each CXL device may have multiple DOE mailbox capabilities and each
> mailbox may support multiple protocols.  CXL port devices need to query
> the CDAT information specifically.
> 
> Search the DOE mailboxes for one which supports the CDAT protocol.
> Cache that mailbox to be used for future queries.
> 
> Only support memory devices at this time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> 
> ---
> Changes from V8
> 	Incorporate feedback from Jonathan
> 	Move all this to the cxl_port object
> 
> Changes from V7
> 	Minor code clean ups
> 
> Changes from V6
> 	Adjust for aux devices being a CXL only concept
> 	Update commit msg.
> 	Ensure devices iterated by auxiliary_find_device() are checked
> 		to be DOE devices prior to checking for the CDAT
> 		protocol
> 	From Ben
> 		Ensure reference from auxiliary_find_device() is dropped
> ---
>  drivers/cxl/core/pci.c  | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/cxl/core/port.c |  2 ++
>  drivers/cxl/cxl.h       |  2 ++
>  drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h    |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> index c4c99ff7b55e..5497a65bdcf3 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c
> @@ -4,11 +4,14 @@
>  #include <linux/device.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-doe.h>
>  #include <cxlpci.h>
>  #include <cxlmem.h>
>  #include <cxl.h>
>  #include "core.h"
>  
> +#define CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS 2
> +
>  /**
>   * DOC: cxl core pci
>   *
> @@ -458,3 +461,28 @@ int cxl_hdm_decode_init(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_hdm_decode_init, CXL);
> +
> +void cxl_find_cdat_mb(struct cxl_port *port)

kdoc would be good for exported symbols IMO. Also if you can come up with a
better verb than "find" for something that mutates the port's state, I think
that would be beneficial.

I'm not sure why this is exported yet, but I suppose I'll see soon :-)

> +{
> +	struct device *dev = port->uport;
> +	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
> +	struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!is_cxl_memdev(dev))
> +		return;
> +
> +	cxlmd = to_cxl_memdev(dev);
> +	cxlds = cxlmd->cxlds;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < cxlds->num_mbs; i++) {
> +		struct pci_doe_mb *cur = cxlds->doe_mbs[i];
> +
> +		if (pci_doe_supports_prot(cur, PCI_DVSEC_VENDOR_ID_CXL,
> +					  CXL_DOE_PROTOCOL_TABLE_ACCESS)) {
> +			port->cdat_mb = cur;
> +			return;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_find_cdat_mb, CXL);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> index ea60abda6500..2e2bd65c1024 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/port.c
> @@ -461,6 +461,8 @@ struct cxl_port *devm_cxl_add_port(struct device *host, struct device *uport,
>  	if (IS_ERR(port))
>  		return port;
>  
> +	cxl_find_cdat_mb(port);
> +
>  	dev = &port->dev;
>  	if (is_cxl_memdev(uport))
>  		rc = dev_set_name(dev, "endpoint%d", port->id);
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> index 140dc3278cde..0a86be589ffc 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
> @@ -267,6 +267,7 @@ struct cxl_nvdimm {
>   * @component_reg_phys: component register capability base address (optional)
>   * @dead: last ep has been removed, force port re-creation
>   * @depth: How deep this port is relative to the root. depth 0 is the root.
> + * @cdat_mb: Mailbox which supports the CDAT protocol
>   */
>  struct cxl_port {
>  	struct device dev;
> @@ -278,6 +279,7 @@ struct cxl_port {
>  	resource_size_t component_reg_phys;
>  	bool dead;
>  	unsigned int depth;
> +	struct pci_doe_mb *cdat_mb;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> index fce1c11729c2..366b21bd1a01 100644
> --- a/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> +++ b/drivers/cxl/cxlpci.h
> @@ -74,4 +74,5 @@ static inline resource_size_t cxl_regmap_to_base(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>  int devm_cxl_port_enumerate_dports(struct cxl_port *port);
>  struct cxl_dev_state;
>  int cxl_hdm_decode_init(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct cxl_hdm *cxlhdm);
> +void cxl_find_cdat_mb(struct cxl_port *port);
>  #endif /* __CXL_PCI_H__ */
> -- 
> 2.35.1
>